Trace

Donor lottery

organization

Total granted
$25,000
Grants
2
Average size
$12,500
Coverage
100%
itemized by recipient
Years active
2018

Grants over time

$0$10K$20K$30K2018

Biggest cause areas

Other existential risk$20,00080%1
Animal welfare$5,00020%1

Biggest recipients

Global Catastrophic Risk Institute$20,00080%1
Wild-Animal Suffering Research$5,00020%1

Grants made

DateRecipientViaAmountCauseSourcePurpose
Nov 12, 2018Wild-Animal Suffering Research$5,000Animal welfarevipul_donationsThe blog post explaining the donation has some discussion of the grantee. Highlight: "Overall I think WASR is a well-run organisation with a clear strategy and a short but encouraging track record. I would encourage those with a near-term animal welfare centric worldview to support them. Under my own worldview, I did not find them competitive with the other organisations, and so recommended a small grant of $5,000."
Nov 12, 2018Global Catastrophic Risk Institute$20,000Other existential riskvipul_donationsThe blog post explaining the donation contains an extensive discussion of the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute (GCRI). Highlight: "Overall I am moderately excited about supporting the work of GCRI and in particular Seth Baum. I am pessimistic about room for growth, with recruitment being a major challenge, similar to that faced by AI Impacts. [...] At their current budget level, additional funding is a factor for whether Seth continues to work at GCRI full-time. Accordingly I would recommend donations sufficient to ensure Seth can continue his work. I would encourage donors to consider funding GCRI to scale beyond this, but to first obtain more information regarding their long-term plans and recruitment strategy." Earlier in the post: "If I had an additional $100k to donate, I would first check AI Impacts current recruitment situation; if there are promising hires that are bottlenecked on funding, I would likely allocate it there. Otherwise, I would split it equally between ALLFED and GCRI."